UberX regulation — vTaiwan

The flagship deliberation-to-policy story: consensus statements from this conversation directly shaped Taiwan's ridesharing regulation.

Online ride-hailing innovation services have risen rapidly. Should UberX, which offers different choices and experiences, be required to follow the same laws as Taiwan's yellow cabs or rental car operators? Everyone is welcome to join the discussion.

• Reference materials index (contributions welcome).
• Click "Share your view..." to add your opinion, and please start with "I think..."
• New opinions are independent — there is no need to reply to other people's views.
• If you have multiple feelings, please write them separately. Please do not use questions.
• Click "Common opinions" to see arguments shared by people with different stances.
• Please refer to the online consultation meeting audio/video and text records.

Next, we will ask the Ministry of Transportation to respond, and decide whether to launch the next stage of discussion on vTaiwan.tw.

(Note: this system is not meant for counting votes, but to find "diverse distribution groups" and "common opinions across stances". Therefore many people holding the same opinion will be represented as a single point. Everyone is welcome to share their own views.)

---

Source data

• Case study: https://compdemocracy.org/case-studies/2015-vtaiwan-uberx
• Polis report: https://pol.is/report/r32beaksmhwesyum6kaur
• Open data: https://github.com/compdemocracy/openData/tree/master/vtaiwan.uberx

Data was gathered using the Polis software (compdemocracy.org/polis) and is sub-licensed under CC BY 4.0 with Attribution to The Computational Democracy Project. The data and more information about how the data was collected can be found at: https://compdemocracy.org/case-studies/2015-vtaiwan-uberx